Abstract
To understand the relationship between drug dose and efficacy, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics need to be integrated. There are two patterns of antimicrobial activity: time-dependent killing and concentration-dependent killing. Time-dependent killing is characteristic of β-lactams and some macrolides. The major PK/PD parameter correlating with efficacy of time-dependent antimicrobials is the serum concentration present for 40–50% of the dosing interval, and this concentration is the susceptibility limit or breakpoint for the dosing regimen used. Concentration-dependent killing is seen with aminoglycosides, quinolones, some macrolides and azalide. The major PK/PD parameter correlating with efficacy of these agents is the 24-hour area under the curve to MIC ratio, which should be ≥25 for less severe infections (≥100 in more severe infections or in immunocompromised hosts). PK/PD breakpoints for concentration-dependent agents can therefore be calculated from the formula AUC/25. For an antimicrobial to be useful empirically the MIC90 of the agent against the common pathogens responsible for the disease being treated should be below the PK/PD breakpoint. This is particularly important for oral therapy of respiratory tract infections, where efficacy against predominant pathogens (S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae, including strains with emerging resistance) is required. PK/PD principles have been applied to recent Russian isolates of these species in this article.
-
1.
Craig W.A. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic para-meters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice andmen. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26:1-10.
-
2.
Craig W.A. Interrelationship between pharmacokineticsand pharmacodynamics in determining dosage regimensfor broad-spectrum cephalosporins. Diagn MicrobiolInfect Dis 1995; 22:89-96.
-
3.
Craig W.A. Antimicrobial resistance issues of the future.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1996; 25:213-7.
-
4.
Craig W.A. Postantibiotic effects and dosing of macro-lides, azalides, and streptogramins. In: Zinner S.H.,Young L.S., Acar J.F., Neu H.C., editors. Expanding indi-cations for the new macrolides, azalides and strep-togramins. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1997. p. 27-38.
-
5.
Craig W.A., Dalhoff A. Pharmacodynamics and pharma-cokinetics of fluoroquinolones in experimental animals.In: Kuhlman J., Dalhoff A., Zeiler H.J., editors. Hand-book of experimental pharmacology. Berlin: SpringerVerlag; 1997.
-
6.
Dagan R., Leibovitz E., Leiberman A., Yagupsky D.Clinical significance of antibiotic resistance in acute oti-tis media and implication of antibiotic treatment on car-riage and spread of resistant organisms. Pediatr InfectDis J 2000; 19:S57-S65.
-
7.
Dagan R., Johnson C.E., McLinn S., et al. Bacteriologicand clinical efficacy of amoxicillin/clavulanate vsazithromycin in acute otitis media. Pediatr Infect Dis J2000; 19:95-104.
-
8.
De Abate C.A., Henry D., Bensch G., et al. Sparfloxacin vsofloxacin in the treatment of acute bacterial exacerbationsof chronic bronchitis: a multicenter, double-blind, ran-domized, comparative study. Sparfloxacin MulticenterABECB Study Group. Chest 1998; 114:120-30.
-
9.
Dowell S.F, Butler J.C., Geibink G.S., Jacobs M.R.,Jernigen D., Musher D.M., Rakowsky A., Schwartz B.,and the Drug-resistantStreptococcus pneumoniaeTherapeutic Working Group. Acute otitis media: man-agement and surveillance in an era of pneumococcal resis-tance - a report from the Drug-resistantStreptococcuspneumoniaeTherapeutic Working Group. Pediatr InfectDis J 1999; 18:1-9.
-
10.
Drusano G.L., Craig W.A. Relevance of pharmacokinet-ics and pharmacodynamics in the selection of antibioticsfor respiratory tract infections. J Chemother 1997;9(Suppl 3):38-44.
-
11.
Anzueto A., Niederman M.S., Tillotson G.S. Etiology,susceptibility, and treatment of acute bacterial exacerba-tions of complicated chronic bronchitis in the primarycare setting: ciprofloxacin 750 mg b.i.d. versus clar-ithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. Clin Ther 1998; 20:885-900.
-
12.
Bartlett J.G., Breiman R.F., Mandell L.A., File T.M.Community-acquired pneumonia in adults: guidelines formanagement. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26:811-38.
-
13.
Beghi G., Berni F., Carratu L., et al. Efficacy and tolera-bility of azithromycin versus amoxicillin/clavulanic acidin acute purulent exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. JChemother 1995; 7:146-52.
-
14.
Brook I. Microbiology and management of sinusitis. JOtolaryngol 1996; 25:249-56.
-
15.
Campbell D.G. Overview of community acquired pneu-monia. Prognosis and clinical features. Med Clin NorthAm 1994; 78:1035-48.
-
16.
Fine M.J., Smith M.A., Carson C.A., et al. Prognosis andoutcomes of patients with community-acquired pneumo-nia. JAMA 1996; 275:134-41.
-
17.
Forrest A.D., Nix E., Ballow C.H., et al. Pharmaco-dynamics of intravenous ciprofloxacin in seriously illpatients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1993; 37:1073-81.
-
18.
Goldstein F., Bryskier A., Appelbaum P.C., et al. The eti-ology of respiratory tract infections and the antibacterialactivity of fluoroquinolones and other oral antibacterialagents against respiratory pathogens. Clin MicrobiolInfect 1998; 4 (Suppl 2):2S8-2S18.
-
19.
Goldstein F.W. Choice of an oral beta-lactam antibioticfor infections due to penicillin-resistantStreptococcuspneumoniae. Scand J Infect Dis 1997; 29:255-7.
-
20.
Grossman R.F. How do we achieve cost-effective optionsin lower respiratory tract infection therapy? Chest 1998;113 (Suppl 3):205-10.
-
21.
Grüneberg R.N., Felmingham D., and the Alexander Pro-ject Group. Results of the Alexander Project: a continu-ing, multicenter study of the antimicrobial susceptibilityof community-acquired lower respiratory tract bacterialpathogens. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 1996; 25:169-81.
-
22.
Hoberman A., Paradise J.L., Block S., et al. Efficacy ofamoxicillin/clavulanate for acute otitis media: relation toStreptococcus pneumoniaesusceptibility. Pediatr InfectDis J 1996; 15:955-62.
-
23.
Jacobs M.R., Bajaksouzian S., Zilles A., et al. Susceptibi-lity ofStreptococcus pneumoniaeandHaemophilusinfluenzaeto 10 oral antimicrobial agents based on pharmacodynamic parameters: 1997 U.S. surveillance study.Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1999; 43:1901-8.
-
24.
Marchant C.D., Carlin S.A., Johnson C.E., Shurin P.A.Measuring the comparative efficacy of antibacterialagents for acute otitis media: the ‘Polyanna phenome-non’. J Pediatr 1992; 120:72-7.
-
25.
Preston S.L., Drusano G.L., Berman A.L., et al. Prospec-tive development of pharmacodynamic relationshipsbetween measures of levofloxacin exposure and measuresof patient outcome. JAMA 1998; 279:125-9.
-
26.
Jacobs M.R. Optimization of antimicrobial therapy usingpharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. ClinMicrobiol Infect 2001; 7:589-96.
-
27.
Jacobs M.R., Felmingham D., Appelbaum P.C.,Gruneberg R.N. The Alexander Project 1998-2000: sus-ceptibility of pathogens isolated from community-acquired respiratory tract infection to commonly usedantimicrobial agents. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;52:229-46.
-
28.
Kozlov R.S., Kretchikova O.I., Sivaya O.V., et al. Anti-microbial Resistance ofStreptococcus pneumoniaeinDifferent Regions of Russia: Results of prospectiveMulticentre Study (phase A of project PeHAS-I).Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2002; 3:267-77. Russian.
-
29.
Sinus and Allergy Health Partnership. AntimicrobialTreatment Guidelines for Acute Bacterial Rhinosinusitis.Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 123 (Suppl 1,Part 2):S1–S32.
-
30.
Kozlov R.S., Bogdanovitch T.M., Appelbaum P.C., et al.Antistreptococcal activity of telithromycin comparedwith seven other drugs in relation to macrolide resistancemechanisms in Russia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother2002; 46:2963-8.
-
31.
Chodosh S., McCarty J., Farkas S., et al. Randomized,double-blind study of ciprofloxacin and cefuroxime axetilfor treatment of acute bacterial exacerbations of chronicbronchitis. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27:722-9.
-
32.
Chodosh S., Schreurs A., Siami G., et al. Efficacy of oralciprofloxacin vs clarithromycin for treatment of acutebacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Clin InfectDis 1998; 27:730-8.