The effect of the surgical hemostatic product «Hemoblock»TM on in vitro bacterial colonization | CMAC

The effect of the surgical hemostatic product «Hemoblock»TM on in vitro bacterial colonization

Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2020; 22(1):67-70

​ Kuznetsova M.V., Parshakov A.A., Kuznetsova M.P., Afanasievskaya E.V., Gavrilov V.A., Samartsev V.A.
10.36488/cmac.2020.1.67-70
Haemoblock polyacrylate biofilm mesh implant
Section
Personal Experience
Type
Original Article
Publication
Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2020; 22(1):67-70

Objective.

To evaluate effect of «Haemoblock»TM preparation on in vitro bacterial colonization.

Materials and Methods.

Activity of «Haemoblock»ТМ product on the growth and colonization of S. aureus АТСС 25923, S. epidermidis ATCC 28922, E. coli АТСС 25922, P. aeruginosa АТСС 27853 cells in the suspension and on the surface of monofilament macroporous polyester mesh was evaluated.

Results.

This product at concentration of 0.062% and above inhibited bacterial growth and reduced biofilm mass and bacterial cell viability. In addition, the short-term exposure of the mesh implant to the tested product resulted in inhibition of the abiotic surface contamination.

Conclusions.

«Haemoblock»TM product allows not only to ensure hemostasis in open and laparoscopic surgery, but also to reduce the bacterial cell count in the surrounding tissues in the intra- and post-operative periods.

Kuznetsova M.V.

Perm State Medical University named after E.A. Wagner, Perm, Russia

Aleksandr A. Parshakov

Perm State Medical University named after E.A. Wagner, Perm, Russia

Kuznetsova M.P.

Perm State Medical University named after E.A. Wagner, Perm, Russia

Afanasievskaya E.V.

Perm State Medical University named after E.A. Wagner, Perm, Russia

Gavrilov V.A.

Perm State Medical University named after E.A. Wagner, Perm, Russia

Samartsev V.A.

Perm State Medical University named after E.A. Wagner, Perm, Russia

  • 1. Mihaljevic A.L., Mihaljevic A.L., Schirren R., Ottl S., Grün S., Michalski C.W., et al. Multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial of standard abdominal wound edge protection with surgical dressings versus coverage with a sterile circular polyethylene drape for prevention of surgical site infections: a CHIRNet trial (BaFO; NCT01181206). Ann Surg. 2014;260(5):730739. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000954
  • 2. Pinkney T.D., Calvert M., Bartlett D.C., Gheorghe A., Redman V., Dowswell G., et al. Impact of wound edge protection devices on surgical site infection after laparotomy: multicentre randomised controlled trial (ROSSINI Trial). BMJ. 2013;347:f4305. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f4305
  • 3. Nguyen M.T., Berger R.L., Hicks S.C., Davila J.A., Li L.T., Kao L.S., et al. Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral herniorrhaphy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(5):415-421. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5014
  • 4. Deerenberg E.B., Mulder I.M., Grotenhuis N., Ditzel M., Jeekel J., Lange J.F. Experimental study on synthetic and biological mesh implantation in a contaminated environment. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1734-1741. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.8954
  • 5. Parshakov А.А., Gavrilov V.А., Samartsev V.А. Prevention of complications of incisional hernia repair: current problem state (review). Sovremennye tehnologii v medicine. 2018;10(2):175186. Russian. DOI: 10.17691/stm2018.10.2.21
  • 6. Anderson D.J. Surgical site infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2011;25(1):135-153. DOI: 10.1016/j.idc.2010.11.004
  • 7. Annabi N., Tamayol A., Shina S.R., Ghaemmaghami A.M., Peppas N.A., Khademhosseini A. Surgical materials: Current challenges and nano-enabled solutions. Nano Today. 2014;9(5):574-589. DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2014.09.006
  • 8. Chen Y., Tan H. Crosslinked carboxymethylchitosan-g-poly (acrylic acid) copolymer as a novel superabsorbent polymer. Carbohydr Res. 2006;341(7):887-896. DOI: 10.1016/j.carres.2006.01.027
  • 9. Peng T. Biomaterials for hemorrhage control. Trends Biomater Artif Organs. 2010;24(1):27-68.
  • 10. Kim T., Nam S., Lim S., Kim H. Facile in-situ preparation of poly (acrylic acid)-silver nanocomposite thin films with highly dispersed silver nanoparticles. Mol Crystals Liq Crystals. 2012;568(1):170178. DOI: 10.1080/15421406.2012.710393
  • 11. Fahmy A., Eisa W.H., Yosef M., Hassan A. Ultra-Thin Films of Poly(acrylic acid)/Silver Nanocomposite Coatings for Antimicrobial Applications. J Spectroscopy. 2016(5):1-11. DOI: 10.1155/2016/7489536
  • 12. Andreev A.I., Ibragimov A.I., Kuznecov M.V., Fatyhov A.M., Anisimov A.Ju. Clinical experience of using «Haemoblock» hemostatic solution in surgical practice. Kazanskij medicinskij zhurnal. 2015;96(3):451-455. Russian.
  • 13. Plotkin A.V., Pokrovskij E.Zh., Voronova G.V., Menglet K.A. The evaluation of the effectivity of hemostatic activity of «Haemoblock» for local topical use in different surgical situations. Multicenter clinical trials. Vestnik sovremennoj klinicheskoj mediciny. 2015;8(1):56-61. Russian.
  • 14. Merritt J.H., Kadouri D.E., O'Toole G.A. Growing and analyzing static biofilm. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2005;22(1):1B.1.1-1B.1.18. DOI: 10.1002/9780471729259.mc01b01s00
Views
0 Abstract
0 PDF
0 Crossref citations
Shared