Abstract
To compare the pharmacodynamics of daptomycin (DAP) and vancomycin (VAN) as well as killing kinetics of S. aureus with different MICs were studied at widely ranged AUC/MIC ratios. Two clinical isolates, S. aureus 866 (MICDAP 0.35 µ/ml and MICVAN 0.70 µ/ml) and S. aureus 10 (MICDAP 1.1 µ/ml and MICVAN 1.3 µ/ml) were exposed to DAP (as a single dose) and VAN (as two 12-h doses). Mono-exponential concentration decay was simulated with half-lives of 9 h (DAP) and 6 h (VAN) and AUC/MIC ratio varied from 43 to 970 h and from 33 to 1150 h respectively. Anti-staphylococcal effects of DAP and VAN depended on the simulated AUC/MICs:the higher the AUC/MIC, the lower numbers of surviving organisms and the later regrowth. Despite pronounced variability of the time-kill curves, AUC/MIC relationships of the ABBC were specific for DAP and VAN. Based on the ABBC-AUC/ MIC relationships, the effects of DAP (4 mg/kg – proposed therapeutic dose) on S. aureus may be greater than those of two 1-g doses of VAN given with a 12-h interval. These findings predict greater anti-staphylococcal effects of clinically achievable AUC/MICs of DAP relative to VAN.
-
1.
Carpenter C.F., Chambers H.F. Daptomycin:another novel agent for treating infections due to drug-resistant gram-positive pathogens. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38:994– 1000.
-
2.
Schriever C.A., Fernandez C., Rodvold K.A., Danziger L.H.. Daptomycin:a novel cyclic lipopeptide antimicrobial. Am J Health–Syst Pharm 2005; 62:1145–58.
-
3.
Critchley I.A., Blosser-Middleton R.S., Jones M.E., Thornsberry C., Sahm D.F., Karlowsky J.A.. Baseline study to determine in vitro activities of daptomycin against gram-positive pathogens isolated in the United States in 2000-2001. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47:1689-93.
-
4.
Critchley I.A., Draghi D.C., Sahm D.F., Thornsberry C., Jones M.E., Karlowsky J.A. Activity of daptomycin against susceptible and multidrug-resistant gram-positive pathogens collected in the SECURE study (Europe) during 2000-2001. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003; 51:639-49.
-
5.
Fass R.J., Helsel V.L. In vitro activity of LY146032 against staphylococci, streptococci, and enterococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1986; 30:781-4.
-
6.
Fluit A.C., Schmitz F.-J., Verhoef J., Milatovic D. In vitro activity of daptomycin against gram-positive European clinical isolates with defined resistance determinants. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48:1007-11.
-
7.
Fuchs P.C., Barry A.L., Brown S.D. In vitro bactericidal activity of daptomycin against staphylococci. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002; 49:467–70.
-
8.
Huovinen P., Kotilainen P. In vitro activity of a new cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic, LY146032, against gram-positive clinical bacteria. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987; 31:455-7.
-
9.
Jones R.N., Barry A.L. Antimicrobial activity and spectrum of LY146032, a lipopeptide antibiotic, including susceptibility test recommendations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987; 31:625-9.
-
10.
King A., Phillips I. The in vitro activity of daptomycin against 514 gram-positive aerobic clinical isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 48:219–23.
-
11.
Knapp C.C., Washington II J.A. Antistaphylococcal activity of a cyclic peptide, LY146032, and vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1986; 30:938-9.
-
12.
Rybak M.J., Hershberger E., Moldovan T., Grucz R.G. In vitro activities of daptomycin, vancomycin, linezolid, and quinupristin–dalfopristin against staphylococci and enterococci, include vancomycin-intermediate and -resistant strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44:1062–6.
-
13.
Snydman D.R., Jacobus N.V., McDermott L.A., Lonks J.R., Boyce J.M. Comparative in vitro activities of daptomycin and vancomycin against resistant gram-positive pathogens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44:3447-50.
-
14.
Stratton C.W., Liu C., Weeks L.S. Activity of LY146032 compared with that of methicillin, cefazolin, cefamandole, cefuroxime, ciprofloxacin, and vancomycin against staphylococci as determined by kill-kinetic studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1987; 31:1210-5.
-
15.
Woodworth J.R., Nyhart. Jr. E.H., Brier G.L., Wolny J.D., Black H.R. Single-dose pharmacokinetics and antibacterial activity of daptomycin, a new lipopeptide antibiotic, in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1992; 36:318-25.
-
16.
Rybak M.J., Bailey E.M., Lamp K.C., Kaatz G.W. Pharmacokinetics and bactericidal rates of daptomycin and vancomycin in intravenous drug abusers being treated for gram-positive endocarditis and bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1992; 36:1109-14.
-
17.
Cha R., Rybak M.J. Daptomycin against multiple drug– resistant staphylococcus and enterococcus isolates in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003; 47:539–46.
-
18.
Akins R.A., Rybak M.J. In vitro activities of daptomycin, arbekacin, vancomycin, and gentamycin alone and/or in combination against glycopeptide intermediate–resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2000; 44:1925–9.
-
19.
Cha R., Brown W.J., Rybak M.J. Bactericidal activities of daptomycin, quinupristin–dalfopristin, and linezolid against vancomycin–resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47:3960–3.
-
20.
Akins R.L., Rybak M.J. Bactericidal activities of two daptomycin regimens against clinical strains of glycopeptide intermediate–resistant Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin–resistant enterococcus faecium, and methicillin–resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001; 45:454–9.
-
21.
Tsuji B.T., Rybak M.J. Short-course gentamicin in combination with daptomycin or vancomycin against Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic model with simulated endocardial vegetations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49:2735-45.
-
22.
Cha R., Grucz Jr. R.G., Rybak M. J. Daptomycin dose– effect relationship against resistant gram–positive organisms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003; 47:1598–1603.
-
23.
Hanberger H., Nilsson L.E., Maller R., Isaksson B. Pharmacodynamics of daptomycin and vancomycin on Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus aureus demonstrated by studies of initial killing and postantibiotic effect and influence of Ca2+ and albumin on these drugs. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1991; 35:1710-6.
-
24.
Firsov A.A., Vostrov S.N., Shevchenko A.A., Cornaglia G. Parameters of bacterial killing and regrowth kinetics and antimicrobial effect examined in terms of area under the concentration–time curve relationships:action of ciprofloxacin against Escherichia coli in an in vitro dynamic model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1997; 41:1281–7.
-
25.
Firsov A.A., Shevchenko A.A., Vostrov S.N., Zinner S.H. Inter- and intraquinolones predictors of antimicrobial effect in an in vitro dynamic model:new insight into a widely used concept. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42:659–65.
-
26.
Firsov A.A., Lubenko I.Y., Portnoy Y.A., et al. Relationships of the area under the curve/MIC ratio to different integral endpoints of the antimicrobial effect: gemifloxacin pharmacodynamics in an in vitro dynamic model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2001; 45:927–31.
-
27.
Фирсов А.А., Назаров А.Д., Черных В.М. Фармакокинетические подходы к оптимизации антибиотикотерапии. Итоги науки и техники. ВИНИТИ, Москва. 1989; 17:1-228.
-
28.
Huang V., Rybak M.J. Pharmacodynamics of cefepime alone and in combination with various antimicrobials against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 44:1925-9.
-
29.
Kaatz G.W, Seo S.M., Reddy V.N., et al. Daptomycin compared with teicoplanin and vancomycin for therapy of experimental Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990; 34:2081-5.
-
30.
Wiedemann B., Fuhst C. Revising the effect of protein binding on the pharmacodynamics of antibiotics. 44th Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Washington, D.C., USA, 2004. Abstr. A-1466.