Comparative In Vitro Activity of Native Honey and Commercially Available Honey Preparations Against Bacterial Isolates with Extreme Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes | CMAC

Comparative In Vitro Activity of Native Honey and Commercially Available Honey Preparations Against Bacterial Isolates with Extreme Antimicrobial Resistance Phenotypes

Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2016; 18(1):49-55

​ Privolnev V.V., Edelstein M.V., Sukhorukova M.V., Timokhova A.V., Dekhnich A.V.
honey antimicrobial activity resistance
Section
Antimicrobials
Type
Journal article
Publication
Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2016; 18(1):49-55

Abstract

This paper presents data on in vitro activity of native honey against bacterial isolates with extreme resistance phenotypes. Comparison of antimicrobial activity of foreign honey preparations approved for the local treatment of infections with that of native honey was also performed. A native honey was demonstrated to be superior to foreign honey preparations and highly active against extremely drug-resistant isolates.

Vladislav V. Privolnev

Smolensk State Medical University, Smolensk, Russia

Mikhail V. Edelstein

Smolensk State Medical University, Smolensk, Russia

Marina V. Sukhorukova

Smolensk State Medical University, Smolensk, Russia

Anna V. Timokhova

Smolensk State Medical University, Smolensk, Russia

Andrey V. Dekhnich

Smolensk State Medical University, Smolensk, Russia

  • 1. Jull A. B., Rodgers A., Walker N. Honey as a topical treatment for wounds. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2008; ID CD005083.
  • 2. Blair S.E. The unusual antibacterial activity of medicalgrade Leptospermum honey: antibacterial spectrum, resistance and transcriptome analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2009; 28(10):1199-208.
  • 3. Molan P.C. The evidence and the rationale for the use of honey as a wound dressing. Wound Practice and Research 2011; 19(4):204-20.
  • 4. Привольнев В.В., Даниленков Н.В. Мёд в лечении инфицированных ран. Клин микробиол антимикроб химиотер 2014; 16:219-28.
  • 5. Berthold N., Hoffmann R. Cellular uptake of apidaecin 1b and related analogs in Gram-negative bacteria reveals novel antibacterial mechanism for proline-rich antimicrobial peptides. Protein Pept Lett 2014; 21:391-8.
  • 6. Czihal P., Knappe D., Fritsche S., et al. Api88 is a novel antibacterial designer peptide to treat systemic infections with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. ACS Chem Biol 2012; 20(7):1281-91.
  • 7. Cooper R.A., Molan P.C., Harding K.G. Antibacterial activity of honey against strains of Staphylococcus aureus from infected wounds. J R Soc Med 1999; 92(6):283-5.
  • 8. Cooper R.A., Molan P.C. The use of honey as an antiseptic in managing Pseudomonas infection. J Wound Care 1999; 8(4):161-4.
  • 9. Allen K.L., Hutchinson G., Molan P.C. The potential for using honey to treat wounds infected with MRSA and VRE. First World Wound Healing Congress, 2000; Melbourne, Australia.
Views
0 Abstract
0 PDF
0 Crossref citations
Shared