Comparative Clinical and Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Different Antimicrobial Treatment Regimens in Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia | CMAC

Comparative Clinical and Pharmacoeconomic Analysis of Different Antimicrobial Treatment Regimens in Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2012; 14(3):209-221

​ Rachina S.A., Kozlov R.S., Samuylo E.K., Makushin D.A.
community-acquired pneumonia health economics azithromycin levofloxacin
Section
Diseases and Pathogens
Type
Journal article
Publication
Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2012; 14(3):209-221

Objective.

To conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis of combination of azithromycin with b-lactams (cefotaxime, ceftriaxone or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid) vs levofloxacin in hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Materials and Methods.

We performed standard search and meta-analysis of prospective clinical trials (CT) to compare clinical success rate and tolerability of regimens of antibacterial therapy (ABT) under the investigation. Direct medical costs (DC) including cost of ABT and hospital stay were calculated from the perspective of Smolensk Regional Clinical Hospital and Central Clinical Hospital of Russian Academy of Sciences. Costs of ABT and DC were analysed both for original and generic antibiotics (AB). The length of hospital stay corresponded to routine clinical practice in base case scenario and duration of ABT in CT in alternative scenario. Uncertainty was investigated in one and two-way sensitivity analyses.

Results.

Two comparative CT of azithromycin + ceftriaxone +/– cefuroxime (Group 1) vs levofloxacin (Group 2) were found. Meta-analysis showed similar overall clinical success rates as well as tolerability profile of combination ABT and levofloxacin monotherapy in hospitalized adults with CAP. Cost of ABT with original AB in Smolensk Regional Clinical Hospital in Group 1 was 4056.7 rubles, in Group 2 – 7010.3 rubles, DC – 17561.1 and 20514.7 rubles in base case scenario, 13027.5 and 17813.8 rubles, respectively, in alternative scenario; as for Central Clinical Hospital of Russian Academy of Sciences cost of ABT in Group 1 was 4005.3 rubles, in Group 2 – 6964.8 rubles, DC – 17165.3 and 20124.8 rubles in base case scenario, 12747.3 and 17492.8 rubles, respectively, in alternative scenario. The results were insensitive to variables of interest. Cost of ABT with generics in Smolensk Regional Clinical Hospital in Group 1 was 1871.8 rubles, in Group 2 – 1611.5 rubles, DC – 15376.2 and 15115.9 rubles in base case scenario, 10842.6 and 12415.0 rubles, respectively, in alternative scenario; in Central Clinical Hospital of Russian Academy of Sciences cost of ABT in Group 1 was 1859.6 rubles, in Group 2 – 1694.8 rubles, DC – 15019.6 and 14854.8 rubles in base case scenario, 10601.6 and 12222.8 rubles, respectively, in alternative scenario. The results were sensitive to length of intravenous antibiotic therapy and length of hospital stay changes.

Conclusions.

Combination ABT with azithromycin + ceftriaxone +/– cefuroxime is more cost effective compared to levofloxacin monotherapy for hospitalized adults with CAP if original AB are used. The choice of less costly regimen of ABT for generics depends on duration of intravenous AB use and length of hospital stay.

  • 1. Nair G.B., Niederman M.S. Community-acquired pneumonia: an unfinished battle. Med Clin N Am 2011:95; 1143-61.
  • 2. Синопальников А.И. Бактериальная пневмония. В кн.: Респираторная медицина. Под ред. А.Г. Чучалина М.: ГЭОТАР-Медиа. 2007. С. 474-509Т. 1. 800 с.
  • 3. Pneumonia. In: European lung white book. 2nd ed. Sheffield, UK: European Resiratory Society/European Lung Foundation 2003; 55-65.
  • 4. Заболеваемость населения России. Федеральное государственное бюджетное учреждение «Центральный научно-исследовательский институт организации и информатизации здравоохранения» Министерства здравоохранения и социального развития Российской Федерации. Доступно на сайте: www.mednet.ru.
  • 5. Welte T., Torres A., Nathwani D. Clinical and economic burden of community-acquired pneumonia among adults in Europe. Thorax 2010: doi:10.1136/thx.2009.129502.
  • 6. File T.M. Jr., Marrie T.J. Burden of community-acquired pneumonia in North American adults. Postgrad Med 2010;122:130-41.
  • 7. Scott G., Scott H., Turlay M., Baker M. Economic cost of community-acquired pneumonia in New Zealand adults. N Z Med J 2004; 117 (1196):U933.
  • 8. Guest J.F., Morris A. Community-acquired pneumonia: the annual cost to the National Health Service in the UK. Eur Respir J 1997; 10:1530-4.
  • 9. Baltolome M., Almirall J., Morera J., et al. A populationbased study of the costs of care for community-acquired pneumonia. Eur Respir J 2004; 23: 610-6.
  • 10. Чучалин А.Г., Синопальников А.И., Козлов Р.С., Тюрин И.Е., Рачина С.А. Внебольничная пневмония у взрослых: практические рекомендации по диагностике, лечению и профилактике у взрослых. Москва, 2010.
  • 11. Jadad A.R., Moore R.A., Carroll D., et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1-12.
  • 12. Прайс-листы производителей и дистрибьюторов лекарственных средств. Доступно на сайте: http://www.pharmindex.ru/.
  • 13. Рачина С.А., Козлов Р.С., Шаль Е.П.,. Устюжанин И.В, Асафьева О.Ю., Гуляева С.А. Расчет прямых затрат у госпитализированных пациентов с внебольничной пневмонией: результаты проспективного исследования. Клиническая фармакология и терапия 2010; 2:20-8.
  • 14. Zervos M., Mandell L.A., Vrooman P.S., et al. Comparative efficacies and tolerabilities of intravenous azithromycin plus ceftriaxone and intravenous levofloxacin with stepdown oral therapy for hospitalized patients with moderate to severe community-acquired pneumonia. Treat Respir Med 2004; 3(5):329-36.
  • 15. Frank E., Liu J., Kinasewitz G., Moran G.J., et al. A multicenter, open-label, randomized comparison of levofloxacin and azithromycin plus ceftriaxone in hospitalized adults with moderate to severe community-acquired pneumonia. ClinTher 2002; 24 (8):1292-308.
  • 16. Чучалин А.Г., Синопальников А.И., Козлов Р.С., Рачина С.А. Антибактериальная терапия инфекций нижних дыхательных путей. В кн.: Практическое руководство по антиинфекционной химиотерапии. Под ред. Л.С. Страчунского, Ю.Б. Белоусова, С.Н. Козлова. Смоленск: МАКМАХ, 2007. С. 258-66.
  • 17. Рачина С.А. Фармакоэпидемиологические, фармакоэкономические и фармакотерапевтические подходы к ведению пациентов с внебольничной пневмонией в стационаре. Дисс. докт. мед. наук. Смоленск, 2010.
  • 18. Gonzalez-Moraleja J., Sesma P., Gonzalez C., López M.E., García J.F., Alvarez-Sala J.L. What is the cost of inappropriate admission of pneumonia patients? Arch Bronconeumol 1999; 35:312-16.
  • 19. Reyes S., Martinez R., Valles J.M., Cases E., Menendez R. Determinants of hospital costs in community-acquired pneumonia. Eur Respir J 2008; 31: 1061-67.
  • 20. Bauer T.T., Welte T., Ernen C., et al. Cost analyses of community-acquired pneumonia from the hospital perspective. Chest 2005; 128: 2238-46.
  • 21. Colice G., Morley M., Asche C., Birnbaum H.G. Treatment costs of community-acquired pneumonia in an employed population. Chest 2004; 125:2140-5.
  • 22. Шаль Е.П., Козлов С.Н. Клинико-экономический анализ применения левофлоксацина у госпитализированных больных с внебольничной пневмонией. Материалы I конгресса «Развитие фармакоэкономики и фармакоэпидемиологии в Российской Федерации», 2007; C. 223-4.
  • 23. Samsa G.P., Matchar D.B., Harnett J., Wilson J. A costminimization analysis comparing azithromycin-based and levofloxacin-based protocols for the treatment of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the CAP-IN trial. Chest 2005;128(5):3246- 54.
  • 24. Frei C.R., Jaso T.C., Mortensen E.M., et al. Medical resource utilization among community-acquired pneumonia patients initially treated with levofloxacin 750 mg daily versus ceftriaxone 1000 mg plus azithromycin 500 mg daily: A US-based study. Curr Med Res Opin 2009; 25(4): 859-68.
  • 25. Drummond M.F., Becker D.L., Hux M., et al. An economic evaluation of sequential i.v./po moxifloxacin therapy compared to i.v./po co-amoxiclav with or without clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Chest 2003;124(2):526-35.
Views
0 Abstract
0 PDF
0 Crossref citations
Shared