Abstract
The review presents the basic approaches to biofilm evaluation. From a methodological point of view, these methods can be divided into two groups: dynamic and static. Each method has advantages and disadvantages discussed in this review. In addition there are number of ways to display biofilm. The article shows the need for development of standardized methods of biofilm evaluation for introduction in routine microbiological practices.
-
1.
Гостев В.В., Сидоренко С.В. Бактериальные биопленки и инфекции. Журнал инфектологии 2010; 2(3):4-15.
-
2.
Christensen G.D, Simpson W.A., Younger J.J., et al. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiology 1985; 22(6):996-1006.
-
3.
Nedelmann M., Krokotsch A., Schwarzkopf A., Heesemann J., Laufs R. Characterization of transposon mutants of biofilm-producing Staphylococcus epidermidis impaired in the accumulative phase of biofilm production: Genetic identification of a hexosamine-containing polysaccharide intracellular adhesion. Infect. Immun 1994; 62:3244-53.
-
4.
O’Toole G., Pratt L., Watnick P., et al. Genetic approaches to study of biofilms. Methods Enzymol 1999; 310:91- 109.
-
5.
Stepanovic S., Vuković D., Jezek P., Pavlović M., SvabicVlahović M. Influence of dynamic conditions on biofilm formation by staphylococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2001; 20:502-4.
-
6.
Danhorn R., Hentzer M., Givskov M., Parsek M.R., Fuqua C. Phosphorus limitation enhances biofilm formation of the plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens through the PhoR-PhoB regulatory system. J Bacteriol 2004; 186:4492-501.
-
7.
Seker S., et al. The effects of biofilm thickness on biofilm density and substrate consumption rate in a differential fluidizied bed biofilm reactor (DFBBR). J Biotech 1995; 41:39-47.
-
8.
Coenye T., Nelis H.J. In vitro and in vivo model systems to study microbial biofilm formation. J Microbiol Meth 2010; 83:89-105.
-
9.
Hall-Stoodley L., Rayner J., Stoodley P., Lappin-Scott H. Establishment of experimental biofilms using the modified robbins device and flow cells. Meth Biotechn 1999; 12:307-18.
-
10.
Jakobsen T.H. et al. Qualitative and quantitative determination of quorum sensing inhibition in vitro. Quorum sensing: methods and protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology 2011; 692:253-63.
-
11.
Серегина Н.В. и соавт. Обзор биофизических особенностей микробной адгезии. Вестник новых медицинских технологий 2008; XV(3):175-7.
-
12.
Merritt J.H., et al. Growing and analyzing static biofilms. Current Protocols in Microbiology 2011; 1B.1.1-1B.1.18.
-
13.
Camargo, A.C. Pizzolitto, E.L. Biofilm formation on catheters used after cesarean section as observed by scanning electron microscopy. Intern J Gynecol Obst 2005; 90:148-9.
-
14.
Yerly J., et al. A two-step procedure for automatic and accurate segmentation of volumetric CLSM biofilm images. J Microb Meth 2007; 70:424-33.
-
15.
Jagath L., et al. Bioluminescent imaging of bacterial biofilm infections in vivo. Meth Molecul Biol 2008; 431:225- 39.
-
16.
Nistico L. et al. Fluorescence «in situ» hybridization for the detection of biofilm in the middle ear and upper respiratory tract mucosa. Auditory and Vestibular Research: Methods and Protocols 2008; 493:191-213.
-
17.
Struthers J. K. The Use of a continuous culture system to study the antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria in biofilm. Meth Molecular Med 2000; 48:215-25.