MRSA Typing: Which Methods are the Most Appropriate for Different Purposes? | CMAC

MRSA Typing: Which Methods are the Most Appropriate for Different Purposes?

Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2011; 13(2):168-176

​ Romanov A.V., Dekhnich A.V.
MRSA molecular typing SCCmec MLVA MLST spa typing
Section
Laboratory Diagnosis
Type
Journal article
Publication
Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2011; 13(2):168-176

Abstract

Over the last decades there is an uncontrollable rise of MRSA prevalence. Infections caused by MRSA are associated with high mortality and healthcare costs. New antimicrobial drugs (anti-MRSA cephems, new glycopeptides, lipopeptides, glycilcyclines and others) are only introducing into clinical practice. Given this, control of MRSA distribution is of great importance. Currently, molecular typing methods, which replace phenotypic methods of microorganism comparison, are widely used for these purposes. This paper provides the data on the most common typing methods of S. aureus and scope of their use. In our point of view, use of pulsed field gelelectrophoresis (PFGE) or multilocus VNTR analysis in combination with SCCmec typing is the most appropriate for studying local MRSA epidemiology. In order to investigate global MRSA epidemiology and population structure, methods such as multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and spa typing, may be recommended. These methods provide a high level of reproducibility and possibility for exchanging data between different laboratories all over the world.

  • 1. Dekhnich A., Nikulin A., Ivanchik N., Kretchikova O., Kozlov R.. Susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus nosocomial isolates in Russia: five-year trends. Abstracts of the 19th ECCMID, Helsinki, Finland, 1619 May 2009, Poster №1076.
  • 2. Feil E.J., and M. C. Enright. Analyses of clonality and the evolution of bacterial pathogens. Curr Opin Microbiol 2004; 7:308–13.
  • 3. van Belkum A, Tassios P.T, Dijkshoorn L, et al. Guidelines for the validation and application of typing methods for use in bacterial epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Infect 2007; 13(Suppl 3):1-46.
  • 4. Prévost G., Pottecher B., Dahlet M., Bientz M., Mantz J.M., Piémont Y. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis as a new epidemiological tool for monitoring methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 1991; 17(4):255-69.
  • 5. Tenover F.C., Arbeit R.D., Goehring R.V., e.a. Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 1994; 33:2233–9. 4. Anderson E.S, Williams R.E. Bacteriophage typing of enteric pathogens and staphylococci and its use in epidemiology. J Clin Pathol 1956; 9(2):94-127. 5. Trindade P.A., McCulloch J.A., Oliveira G.A., Mamizuka E.M. Molecular techniques for MRSA typing: current issues and perspectives. Braz J Infect Dis 2003; 7(1):32- 43.
  • 6. Enright M.C., Day N.P., Davies C.E., Peacock S.J., Spratt B.G. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 2000; 38(3):1008- 15.
  • 7. Sabat A., Krzyszton-Russjan J., Strzalka W., e.a. New method for typing Staphylococcus aureus strains: multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat analysis of polymorphism and genetic relationships of clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol 2003; 41(4):1801-4.
  • 8. Hardy K.J., Ussery D.W., Oppenheim B.A., Hawkey P.M. Distribution and characterization of staphylococcal interspersed repeat units (SIRUs) and potential use for strain differentiation. Microbiol 2004; 150:4045-52.
  • 9. Ikawaty R., Willems R.J., Box A.T., Verhoef J., Fluit A.C. Novel multiple-locus variable-number tandemrepeat analysis method for rapid molecular typing of human Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 2008; 46(9):3147-51.
  • 10. Frénay H.M., Bunschoten A.E., Schouls L.M., e.a. Molecular typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on the basis of protein A gene polymorphism. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1996; 15(1):60-4.
  • 11. Chen L., Mediavilla J.R., Oliveira D.C., Willey B.M., de Lencastre H., Kreiswirth B.N. Multiplex real-time PCR for rapid Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec typing. J Clin Microbiol 2009; 47(11):3692-706.
  • 12. Oliveira D.C., de Lencastre H. Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46(7):2155- 61.
  • 13. Milheiriço C., Oliveira D.C., de Lencastre H. Update to the multiplex PCR strategy for assignment of mec element types in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51(9):3374-7.
  • 14. Kondo Y., Ito T., Ma X.X., e.a. Combination of multiplex PCRs for staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type assignment: rapid identification system for mec, ccr, and major differences in junkyard regions. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51:264–74.
  • 15. Lu P.L., Chang J.C., Hsu H.T., e.a. One tube multiplex PCR for simple screening of SCCmec I-V types of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Chemother 2008; 20(6):690-6.
  • 16. Valvatne H., Rijnders M.I., Budimir A., e.a. A rapid, 2- well, multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of SCCmec types I to V in methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2009; 65(4):384-91.
  • 17. Wisplinghoff H., Rosato A.E., Enright M.C., et al. Related clones containing SCCmec type IV predominate among clinically significant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates. Antimicrob Agent Chemother 2003; 47:3574–79.
  • 18. Miragaia M., Couto I., de Lencastre H. Genetic diversity among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE). Microb Drug Resist 2005; 11:83–93.
Views
0 Abstract
0 PDF
0 Crossref citations
Shared