Susceptibility to antiseptic preparations in biofilm-forming Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn wounds | CMAC

Susceptibility to antiseptic preparations in biofilm-forming Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from burn wounds

Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2018; 20(3):249-256

​ Andreeva S.V., Bakhareva L.I., Nokhrin D.Yu., Titova M.V., Khaidarshina N.E., Burmistrova A.L.
10.36488/cmac.2018.3.249-256
S aureus P aeruginosa burn wounds biofilm antiseptic resistance
Section
Personal Experience
Type
Journal article
Publication
Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2018; 20(3):249-256

Abstract

The article presents data on susceptibility to antiseptic preparations in antibiotic-resistant S. aureus and P. aeruginosa strains isolated from burn wounds, which were tested in single-species and double-species biofilms with varying degrees (24-hour and 48-hour) of maturity. The studies demonstrated susceptibility of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa in single- and double-species biofilms to “Prontosan”, “Betadine” and “Chlorophyllipt” and resistance to “Miramistin” and “Chlorhexidine”. The bactericidal effect was achieved at concentrations 1.64 times higher than bacteriostatic concentrations for all the antiseptics tested. A double increase in antiseptic resistance level was observed over biofilm maturation process.

Svetlana V. Andreeva

Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Bakhareva L.I.

Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia
City Clinical Hospital #6, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Nokhrin D.Yu.

Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Titova M.V.

Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Khaidarshina N.E.

Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

Burmistrova A.L.

Chelyabinsk State University, Chelyabinsk, Russia

  • 1. Stoodley P., Sauer K., Davies D.G., Costerton J.W. Biofilms as complex differentiated communities. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2002;56:187-209.
  • 2. Davey M.E., O’Toole G.A. Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000;64:847-867.
  • 3. Flemming H.C., Wingender J. The biofilm matrix. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2010;8(9):623-633.
  • 4. Smirnova T.A., Didenko L.V., Romanova Y.M., Azizbekyan R.R. Structural and functional characteristics of bacterial biofilms. Mikrobiologiya. 2010;79(4):413-423. Russian.
  • 5. Vinnik Yu.S., Teplyakova O.V., Peryanova O.V., Onzul E.V., Kozlov V.V. Significance of film-forming ability of Staphylococcus cultures in a choice of drainage polymer and local antiseptics in infected pancreonecrosis. Vestnik jeksperimental’noj i klinicheskoj hirurgii. 2011;4(4):666-670. Russian.
  • 6. Lyamin A.V., Botkin E.A., Zhestkov A.V. Medical Problems Associated with Bacterial Biofilms. Klinicheskaja mikrobiologija i antimikrobnaja himioterapija. 2012;14(4):268-275. Russian.
  • 7. Chebotar I.V., Mayansky А.N., Konchakova Е.D., Lazareva А.V., Chistyakova V.P. Antimicrobial Resistance of Bacteria in Biofilms. Klinicheskaja mikrobiologija i antimikrobnaja himioterapija. 2012;14(1):51-58. Russian.
  • 8. Rickard A.H., Colacino K.R., Manton K.M., et al. Production of cellcell signaling molecules by bacteria isolated from human chronic wounds. J Appl Microbiol. 2009;108(5):1509-1522.
  • 9. Andreeva S.V., Bahareva L.I., Nohrin D.Ju. Species composition of microflora of burn wounds. Vestnik Cheljabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2013;7(298):58-59. Russian.
  • 10. Cooper R. Biofilms and wounds: much ado about nothing? Wounds UK. 2010;6(4):84-90.
  • 11. Hussien I.A., Habib K.A., Jassim K.A. Bacterial Colonization of Burn Wounds. Baghdad Sci J. 2012;9(4):623-631.
  • 12. Keen E.F., Robinson B.J., Hospenthal D.R., et al. Incidence and bacteriology of burn infections at a military burn center. Burns. 2010;36:461-468.
  • 13. Azimi L., Motevallian A., Ebrahimzadeh Namvar A., Asghari B., Lari A.R. Nosocomial Infections in Burned Patients in Motahari Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Dermatol Res Pract. 2011;2011:436952.
  • 14. Akiyama H., Huh W.K., Yamasaki O., Oono T., Iwatsuki K. Confocal laser scanning microscopic observation of glycocalyx production by Staphylococcus aureus in mouse skin: does S. aureus generally produce a biofilm on damaged skin? Br J Dermatol. 2002;147:879885.
  • 15. Serralta V.W., Harrison-Balestra C., Cazzaniga A.L., Davis S.C., Mertz P.M. Lifestyles of bacteria in wounds: presence of biofilms? Wounds. 2001;13(1):29-34.
  • 16. Akiyama H., Ueda M., Kanazaki H., Tada J., Arata J. Biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from impetigo and furuncle: role of fibrinogen and fibrin. J Dermatol Sci. 1997;16:2-10.
  • 17. Harrison-Balestra C., Cazzaniga A.L., Davis S.C., Mertz P.M. A wound-isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa grows a biofilm in vitro within 10 hours and is visualised by light microscopy. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29(6):631-635.
  • 18. James G.A., Swogger E., Wolcott R., et al. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16(1):37-44.
  • 19. Dietrich L.E., Price-Whelan A., Petersen A., Whiteley M., Newman D.K. The phenazine pyocyanin is a terminal signaling factor in the quorum-sensing network of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol. 2006;61(5):1308-1321.
  • 20. Gilbert P., Maira-Litran T., McBain A.J., Rickard A.H., Whyte F.W. The physiology and collective recalcitrance of microbial biofilm communities. Adv Microb Physiol. 2002;46:202-256.
  • 21. Bjarnsholt T., Kirketerp-Mоller K., Jensen P.О., et al. Why chronic wounds fail to heal: a new hypothesis. Wound Rep Regen. 2008;16(1):2-10.
  • 22. Wolcott R.D., Rhoads D.D., Dowd S.E. Biofilms and chronic wound inflammation. J Wound Care. 2008;17(8):333-341.
  • 23. Wolcott R.D., Dowd S.E. The role of biofilms: are we hitting the right target? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(1):28-37.
  • 24. Kim M.H. Nanoparticle-based therapies for wound biofilm infection: opportunities and challenges. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 2016;15(3):294-304.
  • 25. Ahtjamova N.E. New approaches in the treatment of purulentinflammatory processes of the skin and subcutaneous tissue. Russkij medicinskij zhurnal. 2016;(8):508-510. Russian.
  • 26. Hanenko O.N., Tonko O.V., Levshina N.N., et al. Resistance to antiseptics of staphylococci isolated from burn wounds. Prevention and treatment of hospital infections, resistance of microorganisms to chemotherapy. Proceedings of the republican scientific-practical conference. Minsk, 2006. p. 208-211. Russian.
  • 27. Sheldon A.T. Jr. Antiseptic «Resistance»: Real or Perceived Threat? Clin Infect Dis. 2005;40(11):1650-1656.
  • 28. Encheva Yu.A., Kuznetsova M.V., Rubtsova E.A., Afanasievskaya E.V., Samartsev V.A. Chlorhexidine and “Prontosan” effect on biofilm formed by Staphylococcus aureus (in vitro study). Biologija i jeksperimental’naja medicina. 2015;XXXII(1):84-91. Russian.
  • 29. Yarets Yu., Shauchenka N. A new method for the bacterial biofilms analysis in medicine. Nauka i innovacii. 2016;11(165):68-72. Russian.
  • 30. Elias S., Banin E. Multi-species biofilms: living with friendly neighbors. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;(36):990-1004.
  • 31. Krasilnikov A.P. Guide on antiseptics. Minsk: Vyshjejshaja shkola, 1995. 368 p. Russian.
  • 32. Methodical guidelines on the rapid determination of resistance of bacteria to disinfectants #1100-27-0-117. Russian.
  • 33. Andreeva S.V., Bahareva L.I., Burmistrova A.L. Method for evaluating the effectiveness of antimicrobial action of antiseptics on bacteria existing in the form of biofilms. Patent of Russian Federation #2603100, 2016. Russian.
  • 34. Jarvis B. Statistical Aspects of the Microbiological Examination of Foods, Second Edition. London: Academic Press, 2008.
  • 35. Sokal R.R., Rohlf F.J. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. NY: Freeman and Co, 1995. 887 p.
  • 36. Lang T.A., Secic M. How to Report Statistics in Medicine: Annotated Guidelines for Authors, Editors, and Reviewers, 2nd edition. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians. 2006. 490 p.
  • 37. Whiteley M., Bangera M.G., Bumgarner R.E., et al. Gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Nature. 2001;413:860-864.
  • 38. Tchebotar I.V., Mayanskiy A.N., Mayanskiy N.A. Matrix of microbial biofilms. Klinicheskaja mikrobiologija i antimikrobnaja himioterapija. 2016;18(1):9-19. Russian.
  • 39. Hall-Stoodley L., Stoodley P. Evolving concepts in biofilm infections. Cell Microbiol. 2009;11(7):1034-1043.
  • 40. Miller M.B., Bassler B.L. Quorum sensing in bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2001;55:165-199.
  • 41. Leriche V., Briandet R., Carpentier B. Ecology of mixed biofilms subjected daily to a chlorinated alkaline solution: spatial distribution of bacterial species suggests a protective effect of one species to another. Environ Microbiol. 2003;5:64-71.
  • 42. Al-Bakri A.G., Gilbert P., Allison D.G. Influence of gentamicin and tobramycin on binary biofilm formation by co-cultures of Burkholderia cepacia and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Basic Microbiol. 2005;45:392-396.
  • 43. Burmolle M., Webb J.S., Rao D., et al. Enhanced biofilm formation and increased resistance to antimicrobial agents and bacterial invasion are caused by synergistic interactions in multispecies biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:3916-3923.
  • 44. Kara D., Luppens S.B., Cate J.M. Differences between single- and dual-species biofilms of Streptococcus mutans and Veillonella parvulain growth, acidogenicity and susceptibility to chlorhexidine. Eur J Oral Sci. 2006;114:58-63.
Views
0 Abstract
0 PDF
0 Crossref citations
Shared